Problem!!!(BOMC-2)

Discussion on Bangladesh National Math Camp
sourav das
Posts:461
Joined:Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:05 am
Location:Dhaka
Contact:
Re: Problem!!!(BOMC-2)

Unread post by sourav das » Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:56 pm

Phlembac Adib Hasan wrote:Solution:
Let $P(a_i,a_j)\Rightarrow max(a_i,a_j)-min(a_i,a_j)$
Notice that we can make $20.19=480$ pairs from $20$ elements.But we have $P(a_i,a_j)=P(a_j,a_i)$.Hence the number of pairs is $\frac {480}{2}=240$.
Now notice that The maximum value of $a_i-a_j$ is $69$ and minimum is $1$.So from Pigeon Hole Principle, there is a $k$ for which we can write $a_i-a_j=k$ for $\left \lceil \frac{240}{69} \right \rceil=4$ different $P(a_i,a_j)$.
$20*19=380$. Adib, take your time, ok.
You spin my head right round right round,
When you go down, when you go down down......
(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )

User avatar
*Mahi*
Posts:1175
Joined:Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:46 pm
Location:23.786228,90.354974
Contact:

Re: Problem!!!(BOMC-2)

Unread post by *Mahi* » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:19 pm

Phlembac Adib Hasan wrote:Solution:
Let $P(a_i,a_j)\Rightarrow max(a_i,a_j)-min(a_i,a_j)$
Notice that we can make $20.19=480$ pairs from $20$ elements.But we have $P(a_i,a_j)=P(a_j,a_i)$.Hence the number of pairs is $\frac {480}{2}=240$.
Now notice that The maximum value of $a_i-a_j$ is $69$ and minimum is $1$.So from Pigeon Hole Principle, there is a $k$ for which we can write $a_i-a_j=k$ for $\left \lceil \frac{240}{69} \right \rceil=4$ different $P(a_i,a_j)$.
As Sourav da said, no hurry, and don't make such silly mistake in your calculations. Do not let it turn to fatal.
Please read Forum Guide and Rules before you post.

Use $L^AT_EX$, It makes our work a lot easier!

Nur Muhammad Shafiullah | Mahi

User avatar
Phlembac Adib Hasan
Posts:1016
Joined:Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:49 pm
Location:127.0.0.1
Contact:

Re: Problem!!!(BOMC-2)

Unread post by Phlembac Adib Hasan » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:31 pm

Ooppssss :oops: edited.Now my calculation also says it is impossible for twenty numbers.
Welcome to BdMO Online Forum. Check out Forum Guides & Rules

sourav das
Posts:461
Joined:Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:05 am
Location:Dhaka
Contact:

Re: Problem!!!(BOMC-2)

Unread post by sourav das » Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:09 pm

Actually I'm little bit confused. Do anyone can give me a rigorous proof that it is impossible?
You spin my head right round right round,
When you go down, when you go down down......
(-$from$ "$THE$ $UGLY$ $TRUTH$" )

User avatar
*Mahi*
Posts:1175
Joined:Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:46 pm
Location:23.786228,90.354974
Contact:

Re: Problem!!!(BOMC-2)

Unread post by *Mahi* » Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:53 am

I think $21$ elements is the correct number, as $\binom {21}{2}=210 \approx 3 (70-1)+1$ which gives the four $k$ property.
Please read Forum Guide and Rules before you post.

Use $L^AT_EX$, It makes our work a lot easier!

Nur Muhammad Shafiullah | Mahi

Post Reply