BOMC-2012 Test Day 1 Problem 2
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:06 pm
Show that if a, b, c be integers satisfying \[\frac ab +\frac bc +\frac ca = 3\] then $abc$ is cube of an integer.
The Official Online Forum of BdMO
https://matholympiad.org.bd/forum/
Serious crime.They all are not necessarily positive integers.If they are, it directly comes from AM-GM that $a=b=c$.SANZEED wrote:I am again suggesting that it can be solved by rearrangement inequality,I found it later.(My $70$th post )
SANZEED wrote:I am again suggesting that it can be solved by rearrangement inequality,I found it later.(My $70$th post )
In moments like this, sometimes I think, "What should I do? "Phlembac Adib Hasan wrote:Serious crime.They all are not necessarily positive integers.If they are, it directly comes from AM-GM that $a=b=c$.SANZEED wrote:I am again suggesting that it can be solved by rearrangement inequality,I found it later.(My $70$th post )
,I just googled 'a/b+b/c+c/a perfect cube' and the first result showed me that link.*Mahi* wrote:By the way, where did you get the Yahoo answers link?
Re-arrangement inequality-র বিষয়টি clear করার জন্য ধন্যবাদ।আসলেই জানা ছিল না।আর পরশু google search দিয়ে ঐটা পাইসি।আর শোনেন নায়েল ভাইয়াও জানেন যে আমি দুই number-এর complete solution দেই নাই।পরে যদিও পুরা solve করসি, exam-এর মাঝে নিজে যেটুকু পারসি ততটুকুই post করসি।আমার intention মোটেও ঐ রকম না যে কোন website থেকে টুকলিফাই করে post করব।যদি আমি ঐটা exam-এর মাঝেও পাইতাম তবুও কখনও post করতাম না।*Mahi* wrote:SANZEED wrote:I am again suggesting that it can be solved by rearrangement inequality,I found it later.(My $70$th post )In moments like this, sometimes I think, "What should I do? "Phlembac Adib Hasan wrote:Serious crime.They all are not necessarily positive integers.If they are, it directly comes from AM-GM that $a=b=c$.SANZEED wrote:I am again suggesting that it can be solved by rearrangement inequality,I found it later.(My $70$th post )
Sanzeed, you are wrong, I posted about that yesterday, that you can not WLOG assume $a \geq b \geq c$ here, which is necessary to prove it by rearrangement inequality, because the given equation is cyclic and not symmetric for $a,b,c$.
And Adib, wikipedia says you do not need positive numbers for rearrangement inequality, so I think you are wrong too.
By the way, where did you get the Yahoo answers link? I posted my solutions in general topic on the exam solutions, and I was wondering why the $3$ was not necessary.
(And I also submitted my solutions at 3pm of the first day, if you want to know )